推薦產品
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazole 2-(chloromethyl)-3-methylpyridinehydrochloride 1-(2-bromo-4-methylphenyl)ethanone 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbonitrile 5,8-dichloropyrido[3,2-d]pyridazine 2-bromomalononitrile 2-(4-(bromomethyl)phenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 1-(bromomethyl)-3-methoxy-2-nitrobenzene 6-bromo-1H-[1,2,3]triazolo[4,5-b]pyridine 4-iodo-2-((trimethylsilyloxy)methyl)thiazole 6-iodoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-carbonitrile 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-morpholinoacetonitrile 4-chloro-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine 4-chloroisothiazole 5-bromo-6-chloro-1H-indole 7-chloro-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine ethyl3-(4-formylphenyl)propanoate 2,3-dibromobenzaldehyde 1-(5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-7-yl)ethanone 5H-chromeno[2,3-b]pyridin-5-one 3-chloroisoquinoline-4-carbaldehyde (E)-2-(3-oxoprop-1-enyl)benzaldehyde methyl4-formyl-3-nitrobenzoate 5,6-dimethoxy-2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-1-one 1-methylbicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-one 3-nitro-4-(trifluoromethoxy)benzaldehyde 2-hydroxyquinoline-6-carbaldehyde 2-nitro-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde 1-(2-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)propan-2-one tert-butyl3-fluoro-4-oxopiperidine-1-carboxylate tert-butyl3-oxopropylcarbamate 2,2-dimethylcyclohexanone 9H-carbazole-3-carbaldehyde N,N-dimethyl-2-oxoacetamide 2-methylpent-4-yn-2-ol 3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxybenzonitrile 4-bromo-2-tert-butylphenol 1,3-dibutoxypropan-2-ol methyl4-hydroxyquinoline-6-carboxylate methyl3-cyano-4-hydroxybenzoate 4-chloro-6-methoxyquinolin-7-ol 3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazin-7-ol 2-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)ethanolhydrochloride (R)-ethyl2-chloropropanoate (S)-4-amino-5-(4,4-dimethylcyclohexylamino)-5-oxopentanoicacid (1s,4s)-4-hydroxycyclohexanecarboxylicacid (S)-2-(tetrahydrofuran-3-yloxy)aceticacid (1S,4R)-1-methyl-4-(prop-1-en-2-yl)cyclohex-2-enol (R)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one (S)-4-(hydroxymethyl)oxazolidin-2-one 化工資訊 近年來國內主要化肥產品價格走勢震蕩，據(jù)中宇統(tǒng)計的2015-2018年走勢圖可以看出，自2015年下半年開始化肥各產品價格逐步進入下行通道，這是由于化肥供大于求的矛盾較為突出，同質化產品競爭激烈導致。2016-2017年期間產品價格雖有波動，卻均處于低位整理，那緣何自2017年第四季起價格又有反彈，2018年整體價位也居高不落呢？2018年價格居高主要有以下幾個因素。
首先宏觀方面國家政策方面推出“2020年化肥零增長”、行業(yè)從享受多重優(yōu)惠到目前政策的逐步取消或減少優(yōu)惠幅度，例如用電、化肥運費、氣價優(yōu)惠政策取消，行業(yè)復征增值稅等等。對于化肥企業(yè)來言，供給側改革過程中成本面臨增加的局面。
再者開工率：今年環(huán)保成為常態(tài)，今年有環(huán)?；仡^看、之前有“2+26”環(huán)保實施，部分落后裝置退出市場，行業(yè)整體去產能化加快，全年化肥行業(yè)開工始終在低位徘徊，年初不乏因貨緊，尿素價格炒作明顯。
成本加壓且開工率偏低，供給側改革初見成效，化肥產品價格也擺脫前期觸底陰影，有所上行。至于后期化肥行情樂觀嗎？中宇資訊認為，糧食及農副產品價格低位，基層土地流失嚴重，用肥積極性嚴重不足的前提下，終端農戶對高價肥料較為抵觸，化肥企業(yè)面臨高成本及低需求的擠壓恐操盤艱難，適時轉型尋求商機才是明智之選。
